{"id":6328,"date":"2025-02-16T16:55:49","date_gmt":"2025-02-16T16:55:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/?p=6328"},"modified":"2025-02-16T16:55:49","modified_gmt":"2025-02-16T16:55:49","slug":"celebrities-who-moved-out-of-the-u-s-after-trump-became-president","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/2025\/02\/16\/celebrities-who-moved-out-of-the-u-s-after-trump-became-president\/","title":{"rendered":"Celebrities Who Moved Out of the U.S. After Trump Became President"},"content":{"rendered":"

Celebrities Fleeing or Considering Leaving the U.S. Amid Trump\u2019s Historic Presidency<\/strong><\/p>\n

The political climate in the United States has sparked heated debates and personal decisions, particularly in light of Donald Trump\u2019s recent return to the presidency as the 47th President of the United States. Following his inauguration on January 20, 2025, Trump made history by becoming the first person convicted of a felony to assume the highest office in the nation. This unprecedented event has both captivated and divided public opinion, igniting fears about the direction of the country under his leadership.<\/p>\n

Many Americans have expressed concerns over how Trump\u2019s presidency might impact their lives, and among them are numerous high-profile celebrities. Some of these public figures have shared their apprehensions openly, while others have reportedly begun taking steps to leave the U.S. entirely, citing fears about the country\u2019s direction under Trump\u2019s administration. Notably, a significant number of these individuals are women, reflecting broader anxieties about gender policies and social justice under Trump\u2019s rule.<\/p>\n

Below is a detailed look at celebrities who have either already relocated or are seriously considering leaving the U.S. due to Trump\u2019s presidency.<\/p>\n

Eva Longoria: Finding Solace Abroad<\/h3>\n

Actress Eva Longoria was among the first to confirm her departure from the U.S. Longoria now splits her time between Spain and Mexico, expressing concerns about the potential implications of Trump\u2019s policies. Speaking to\u00a0Marie Claire<\/em>, she described her anxiety:<\/p>\n

\u201cIf he keeps his promises, it\u2019s going to be a scary place. I\u2019m privileged\u2014I get to escape and go somewhere. Most Americans aren\u2019t so lucky. They\u2019re going to be stuck in this dystopian country, and my anxiety and sadness is for them.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Longoria\u2019s move underscores a growing trend among celebrities who fear that Trump\u2019s policies may lead to increased societal divisions and a rollback of progressive values. By relocating, Longoria aims to find a more stable and supportive environment for herself and her family, distancing herself from the political turmoil brewing in the U.S.<\/p>\n

Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi: Starting Fresh in the UK<\/h3>\n

The beloved talk show host\u00a0Ellen DeGeneres<\/a>\u00a0and her wife, Portia de Rossi, have reportedly moved to the Cotswolds in the UK. According to an anonymous source cited by\u00a0The Wrap<\/em>, the couple has vowed not to return to the U.S. while Trump remains in office. The move highlights their desire to distance themselves from the current political landscape, prioritizing a quieter, more stable life abroad.<\/p>\n

DeGeneres and de Rossi\u2019s relocation also reflects concerns about the increasing hostility towards LGBTQ+ individuals under Trump\u2019s administration. As vocal advocates for LGBTQ+ rights, the couple may feel that staying in the U.S. could expose them to greater risks and challenges, prompting their decision to seek refuge in a more accepting environment.<\/p>\n

America Ferrera: Prioritizing Family Overseas<\/h3>\n

Actress America Ferrera is said to have relocated her family to the UK, where she is reportedly exploring school options for her\u00a0children<\/a>. While she plans to maintain a professional presence in the U.S., a source told the\u00a0Daily Mail<\/em>\u00a0that Ferrera is prioritizing her children\u2019s education and well-being:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u201cShe\u2019s not abandoning the U.S.; she\u2019s prioritizing her life and focusing on what\u2019s important for her kids.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ferrera\u2019s move underscores the personal impact of political decisions on families. By relocating, Ferrera aims to provide her children with a stable and supportive environment, free from the uncertainties and potential threats posed by Trump\u2019s policies. This decision highlights the broader implications of political instability on the personal lives of public figures and their families.<\/p>\n

Barbra Streisand: A Vocal Opponent<\/h3>\n

Iconic singer and actress Barbra Streisand has been an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, previously stating she would consider leaving the U.S. if he regained power. During an interview with Stephen Colbert, Streisand did not mince words:<\/p>\n

\u201cI would move. I can\u2019t live here under an administration like that.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

While Streisand has not yet confirmed her plans, her strong opposition to Trump suggests a potential relocation could be on the horizon. Streisand\u2019s influence and vocal stance against Trump\u2019s policies amplify the concerns of many who fear a regression in civil liberties and social progress under his administration.<\/p>\n

Laverne Cox: Seeking Safety Abroad<\/h3>\n

Actress and activist Laverne Cox has voiced her concerns about remaining in the U.S., citing fears of being targeted as a public figure, particularly as anti-trans rhetoric escalates. Speaking to\u00a0Variety<\/em>, Cox shared her apprehensions:<\/p>\n

\u201cAs a public figure, with all my privilege, I\u2019m scared. I feel like I could be targeted. I think they spent close to $100 million on anti-trans ads. It\u2019s deeply concerning.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Cox is reportedly considering a move to Europe or the Caribbean, regions known for their progressive stances on LGBTQ+ rights. Her potential relocation reflects the heightened sense of vulnerability among transgender individuals and allies in the face of Trump\u2019s policies, which many perceive as hostile to gender diversity and inclusivity.<\/p>\n

Cher: Weighing Her Options<\/h3>\n

Pop icon Cher initially planned to leave the U.S. following Trump\u2019s 2016 election victory. While she has since decided to stay, a source told the\u00a0Daily Mail<\/em>\u00a0that her decision stems from her family commitments. \u201cShe\u2019s infuriated by the outcome, but she also knows that running will not solve anything,\u201d the source explained.<\/p>\n

Cher\u2019s internal conflict mirrors that of many celebrities who grapple with the desire to protest policies they disagree with while balancing personal and professional responsibilities. Her choice to remain in the U.S. highlights the complex interplay between political convictions and practical considerations in decisions to relocate.<\/p>\n

Sharon Stone: Eyeing a Move to Italy<\/h3>\n

Actress Sharon Stone has previously expressed interest in moving to Italy, calling it an \u201cintelligent construct\u201d given the current political climate. However, insiders suggest that while Stone is frustrated with the state of U.S. politics, she remains a patriot at heart and is unlikely to leave anytime soon.<\/p>\n

Stone\u2019s contemplation of relocation underscores the emotional toll that Trump\u2019s presidency has taken on prominent figures. Her comments reflect a broader sentiment of disillusionment and the search for environments that align more closely with personal values and aspirations.<\/p>\n

Minnie Driver: Torn Between Two Worlds<\/h3>\n

British actress Minnie Driver, who has lived in Los Angeles for decades, expressed mixed feelings about staying in the U.S. under a Trump administration. Speaking to\u00a0The Times<\/em>, Driver explained:<\/p>\n

\u201cIf I lived in a red [Republican] state, no, I couldn\u2019t. But living in California, you are somewhat insulated. But do you want to go and live in a bubble? Do you run away from the fire, or do you go back and help?\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Driver\u2019s dilemma highlights the nuanced decisions faced by celebrities who balance their desire to remain in the U.S. with their discomfort with the current political environment. Her reflections emphasize the broader debate about engagement versus withdrawal in times of political upheaval.<\/p>\n

Vivian Wilson: Elon Musk\u2019s Daughter Looks Abroad<\/h3>\n

Vivian Wilson, the estranged trans daughter of Elon Musk, has also voiced her intention to leave the U.S. regardless of her father\u2019s political affiliations. Posting on Threads, she wrote:<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t see my future being in the United States. Even if he\u2019s only in office for four years, even if the anti-trans regulations magically don\u2019t happen, the people who willingly voted this in are not going anywhere anytime soon.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Wilson\u2019s decision is a stark reminder of how political climates can influence personal and familial decisions. As a public figure with a prominent family background, her choice to relocate underscores the profound impact of Trump\u2019s policies on individual lives, particularly within marginalized communities.<\/p>\n

A Growing Trend Among Celebrities<\/h3>\n

The trend of celebrities considering relocation highlights the polarizing impact of Trump\u2019s presidency. While some have already left the U.S. for a new chapter abroad, others remain on the fence, torn between their desire to escape and their sense of responsibility to address issues at home.<\/p>\n

Broader Implications<\/h4>\n
    \n
  1. \n
      \n
    1. Cultural Exodus<\/strong>: The potential exodus of high-profile figures could lead to a cultural shift, as influential voices move abroad, potentially reducing the visibility of progressive causes within the U.S. Conversely, it could also inspire a wave of activism and advocacy from those who choose to remain.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
        \n
      1. \n
          \n
        1. Economic Impact<\/strong>: Celebrities often contribute significantly to local economies through investments, philanthropy, and public presence. Their departure could have economic repercussions, particularly in entertainment hubs like Los Angeles and New York.<\/li>\n
        2. Public Sentiment<\/strong>: The decisions of beloved public figures can influence public opinion and behavior. Celebrity relocations may embolden others to voice their discontent or seek similar paths, further deepening societal divisions.<\/li>\n
        3. Policy Repercussions<\/strong>: As influential individuals leave, it could signal a broader dissatisfaction with Trump\u2019s policies, potentially affecting future elections and policy directions as their voices carry weight in political discourse.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Personal Stories Behind the Headlines<\/h3>\n

          Each celebrity\u2019s decision to leave or consider leaving the U.S. is rooted in personal experiences and values. These stories offer a human face to the abstract political debates, illustrating how policy changes and political climates can have tangible effects on individuals and families.<\/p>\n

          Eva Longoria: Balancing Fame and Personal Well-being<\/h4>\n

          Longoria\u2019s move to Spain and Mexico reflects a desire to balance her high-profile career with personal well-being. By choosing to live in countries with more stable and supportive political environments, she aims to protect her mental health and provide a safe space for her family, away from the contentious atmosphere of Trump\u2019s America.<\/p>\n

          Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi: Pursuing Peace and Stability<\/h4>\n

          The couple\u2019s relocation to the UK underscores their pursuit of peace and stability. As advocates for LGBTQ+ rights, moving to a country known for its progressive stance on gender and sexuality offers them a sense of security and acceptance that they may feel is lacking in the current U.S. political climate.<\/p>\n

          America Ferrera:<\/h4>\n

          Continuing with America Ferrera\u2019s story and further expanding the article to provide a comprehensive analysis:<\/p>\n

          America Ferrera: Prioritizing Family and Education<\/h4>\n

          Ferrera\u2019s decision to relocate her family to the UK highlights her commitment to her children\u2019s education and well-being. In an increasingly volatile political environment, Ferrera seeks to provide her children with a stable and supportive environment, free from the uncertainties that Trump\u2019s policies may bring. Her move also signifies a broader trend among celebrities who prioritize family and personal safety over maintaining a public presence in the U.S. Ferrera\u2019s stance underscores the profound impact of political decisions on family life and the lengths to which individuals will go to protect their loved ones.<\/p>\n

          Barbra Streisand: A Vocal Opponent with Potential Relocation Plans<\/h3>\n

          Barbra Streisand\u2019s outspoken criticism of Trump has put her at the forefront of celebrities considering relocation. Her declaration, \u201cI would move. I can\u2019t live here under an administration like that,\u201d during an interview with Stephen Colbert, exemplifies the sentiment of disillusionment felt by many who fear a regression in civil liberties and social progress. While Streisand has not confirmed her plans to leave, her strong opposition suggests that a move could be imminent, further highlighting the personal costs of political leadership and the sacrifices public figures may make in response to their beliefs.<\/p>\n

          Laverne Cox: Navigating Fear and Advocacy Abroad<\/h3>\n

          Laverne Cox\u2019s contemplation of relocation stems from legitimate fears of being targeted as a trans public figure under Trump\u2019s administration. Her concerns about anti-trans rhetoric and the significant financial investment in anti-trans ads highlight the tangible threats faced by marginalized communities. By considering a move to Europe or the Caribbean, Cox seeks a safer environment where her advocacy can continue without the heightened risks of persecution and discrimination. Her potential relocation not only underscores the personal dangers faced by activists but also raises questions about the future of LGBTQ+ rights in the U.S.<\/p>\n

          Cher: Balancing Public Image and Personal Commitments<\/h3>\n

          Cher\u2019s initial plans to leave the U.S. following Trump\u2019s 2016 election victory reflect the intense frustration and disappointment felt by many. Although she has decided to stay, her source\u2019s comment that family commitments influenced this decision highlights the complex interplay between personal values and practical considerations. Cher\u2019s story illustrates the difficult choices celebrities must make between protesting policies they oppose and maintaining their family\u2019s stability, revealing the nuanced nature of relocation decisions.<\/p>\n

          Sharon Stone: Weighing Frustration Against Patriotism<\/h3>\n

          Sharon Stone\u2019s interest in moving to Italy showcases the emotional toll of Trump\u2019s presidency on public figures. Her description of Italy as an \u201cintelligent construct\u201d suggests a search for a more culturally and politically aligned environment. However, insiders indicate that her patriotism and sense of duty may prevent her from making the move, despite her frustrations. Stone\u2019s internal conflict embodies the broader dilemma faced by many who wish to uphold their national identity while seeking refuge from political turmoil.<\/p>\n

          Minnie Driver: Torn Between Comfort and Conviction<\/h3>\n

          British actress Minnie Driver\u2019s mixed feelings about staying in the U.S. under Trump reflect the struggles of maintaining a balance between personal comfort and political conviction. Her comments about living in California being somewhat insulated yet questioning whether to \u201crun away from the fire\u201d or \u201chelp\u201d highlight the complex decisions faced by those who are emotionally invested in their country\u2019s future. Driver\u2019s story emphasizes the role of personal responsibility and the ethical considerations involved in deciding whether to remain and advocate for change or seek safety abroad.<\/p>\n

          Vivian Wilson: A Personal Stand Against Anti-Trans Policies<\/h3>\n

          Vivian Wilson, Elon Musk\u2019s estranged trans daughter, represents the younger generation\u2019s proactive stance against anti-trans policies. Her intention to leave the U.S., regardless of her father\u2019s political affiliations, underscores the pervasive fear and dissatisfaction among transgender individuals. By stating, \u201cI don\u2019t see my future being in the United States,\u201d Wilson not only rejects the current administration\u2019s stance but also aligns herself with a global movement advocating for transgender rights and inclusivity. Her decision is a powerful statement about the personal impact of political policies on identity and future prospects.<\/p>\n

          A Growing Trend Among Celebrities<\/h3>\n

          The trend of celebrities considering or making the decision to leave the U.S. reflects a broader cultural and political shift. These high-profile departures can have significant implications:<\/p>\n

           <\/p>\n

            \n
          1. \n
              \n
            1. Cultural Exodus<\/strong>: The potential departure of influential figures could lead to a cultural shift, as their absence might reduce the visibility of progressive causes within the U.S. entertainment and advocacy landscapes. However, it could also inspire a new wave of activism and advocacy from those who choose to remain and fight for change.<\/li>\n
            2. Economic Impact<\/strong>: Celebrities often contribute significantly to local economies through investments, philanthropy, and their public presence. Their relocation could have economic repercussions, particularly in entertainment hubs like Los Angeles and New York, where their influence and financial contributions help sustain various industries.<\/li>\n
            3. Public Sentiment<\/strong>: The decisions of beloved public figures can influence public opinion and behavior. Celebrity relocations may embolden others to voice their discontent or seek similar paths, further deepening societal divisions. Conversely, they might also encourage dialogue and reflection on the reasons behind such moves, fostering a more informed and engaged citizenry.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

               <\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Policy Repercussions<\/strong>: As influential individuals leave, it could signal a broader dissatisfaction with Trump\u2019s policies, potentially affecting future elections and policy directions as their voices carry weight in political discourse. The outcry and movements sparked by their departures could lead to increased political activism and pressure on lawmakers to address the concerns raised.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Personal Stories Behind the Headlines<\/h3>\n

                Each celebrity\u2019s decision to leave or consider leaving the U.S. is rooted in personal experiences and values. These stories offer a human face to the abstract political debates, illustrating how policy changes and political climates can have tangible effects on individuals and families.<\/p>\n

                Eva Longoria: Balancing Fame and Personal Well-being<\/h4>\n

                Longoria\u2019s move to Spain and Mexico reflects a desire to balance her high-profile career with personal well-being. By choosing to live in countries with more stable and supportive political environments, she aims to protect her mental health and provide a safe space for her family, away from the contentious atmosphere of Trump\u2019s America. Longoria\u2019s decision highlights the importance of mental health and personal safety in the lives of public figures, emphasizing that the impact of political climates extends beyond policy into the very fabric of personal lives.<\/p>\n

                Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi: Pursuing Peace and Stability<\/h4>\n

                The couple\u2019s relocation to the UK underscores their pursuit of peace and stability. As advocates for LGBTQ+ rights, moving to a country known for its progressive stance on gender and sexuality offers them a sense of security and acceptance that they may feel is lacking in the current U.S. political climate. Their decision also reflects the broader challenges faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in the U.S., where policies and societal attitudes can significantly impact their safety and well-being.<\/p>\n

                America Ferrera: Prioritizing Family and Education<\/h4>\n

                Ferrera\u2019s relocation to the UK highlights her commitment to her children\u2019s education and well-being. In an increasingly volatile political environment, Ferrera seeks to provide her children with a stable and supportive environment, free from the uncertainties that Trump\u2019s policies may bring. This decision highlights the broader implications of political instability on the personal lives of public figures and their families, emphasizing the lengths to which individuals will go to protect their loved ones.<\/p>\n

                Barbra Streisand: A Legacy of Advocacy and Potential Relocation<\/h4>\n

                Barbra Streisand\u2019s outspoken opposition to Trump positions her as a potential candidate for relocation. Her strong statements against Trump\u2019s administration reflect her commitment to advocacy and justice, indicating that a move could be a way to align her personal values with her living environment. Streisand\u2019s influence and vocal stance against Trump\u2019s policies amplify the concerns of many who fear a regression in civil liberties and social progress under his administration.<\/p>\n

                Laverne Cox: Navigating Fear and Advocacy Abroad<\/h4>\n

                Laverne Cox\u2019s contemplation of relocation stems from legitimate fears of being targeted as a trans public figure under Trump\u2019s administration. Her concerns about anti-trans rhetoric and the significant financial investment in anti-trans ads highlight the tangible threats faced by marginalized communities. By considering a move to Europe or the Caribbean, Cox seeks a safer environment where her advocacy can continue without the heightened risks of persecution and discrimination. Her potential relocation not only underscores the personal dangers faced by activists but also raises questions about the future of LGBTQ+ rights in the U.S.<\/p>\n

                Cher: Balancing Public Image and Personal Commitments<\/h4>\n

                Cher\u2019s initial plans to leave the U.S. following Trump\u2019s 2016 election victory reflect the intense frustration and disappointment felt by many. Although she has decided to stay, her source\u2019s comment that family commitments influenced this decision highlights the complex interplay between personal values and practical considerations. Cher\u2019s story illustrates the difficult choices celebrities must make between protesting policies they oppose and maintaining their family\u2019s stability, revealing the nuanced nature of relocation decisions.<\/p>\n

                Sharon Stone: Weighing Frustration Against Patriotism<\/h4>\n

                Sharon Stone\u2019s interest in moving to Italy showcases the emotional toll of Trump\u2019s presidency on public figures. Her description of Italy as an \u201cintelligent construct\u201d suggests a search for a more culturally and politically aligned environment. However, insiders indicate that her patriotism and sense of duty may prevent her from making the move, despite her frustrations. Stone\u2019s internal conflict embodies the broader dilemma faced by many who wish to uphold their national identity while seeking refuge from political turmoil.<\/p>\n

                Minnie Driver: Torn Between Comfort and Conviction<\/h4>\n

                British actress Minnie Driver\u2019s mixed feelings about staying in the U.S. under Trump reflect the struggles of maintaining a balance between personal comfort and political conviction. Her comments about living in California being somewhat insulated yet questioning whether to \u201crun away from the fire\u201d or \u201chelp\u201d highlight the complex decisions faced by those who are emotionally invested in their country\u2019s future. Driver\u2019s story emphasizes the role of personal responsibility and the ethical considerations involved in deciding whether to remain and advocate for change or seek safety abroad.<\/p>\n

                Vivian Wilson: A Personal Stand Against Anti-Trans Policies<\/h4>\n

                Vivian Wilson, Elon Musk\u2019s estranged trans daughter, represents the younger generation\u2019s proactive stance against anti-trans policies. Her intention to leave the U.S., regardless of her father\u2019s political affiliations, underscores the pervasive fear and dissatisfaction among transgender individuals. By stating, \u201cI don\u2019t see my future being in the United States,\u201d Wilson not only rejects the current administration\u2019s stance but also aligns herself with a global movement advocating for transgender rights and inclusivity. Her decision is a powerful statement about the personal impact of political policies on identity and future prospects.<\/p>\n

                The Broader Impact of Celebrity Relocation<\/h3>\n

                The decisions of these high-profile individuals to relocate or consider leaving the U.S. have broader implications beyond their personal lives. Their actions can influence public opinion, inspire others to voice their concerns, and potentially shift the cultural landscape of the nation.<\/p>\n

                Cultural Influence<\/h4>\n

                Celebrities hold significant sway over\u00a0public perception\u00a0and societal norms. Their decisions to leave the U.S. can serve as a powerful form of protest, signaling widespread dissatisfaction with the current administration. This trend can amplify calls for political and social change, encouraging more individuals to engage in activism and advocacy efforts.<\/p>\n

                Economic Ramifications<\/h4>\n

                The departure of influential figures can have economic consequences, particularly in industries such as entertainment, technology, and philanthropy. Celebrities often contribute to local economies through investments, charitable work, and their presence in key markets. Their relocation can lead to shifts in where and how economic activities are concentrated, potentially benefiting their new locales while leaving their former homes grappling with the loss of their contributions.<\/p>\n

                Political Consequences<\/h4>\n

                Celebrity relocations can also have political ramifications, as they can draw attention to the administration\u2019s policies and their impact on high-profile individuals. This increased scrutiny can lead to greater public pressure on lawmakers and government officials to address the concerns raised by these departures. Additionally, it can influence voter behavior, as the decisions of beloved public figures may resonate with their fan bases and broader audiences.<\/p>\n

                 <\/p>\n

                Social Justice and Human Rights<\/h4>\n

                The movement of celebrities away from the U.S. underscores the ongoing struggles for social justice and human rights in the country. As advocates for various causes, these individuals often use their platforms to highlight issues such as LGBTQ+ rights, racial equality, and reproductive freedoms. Their relocation can draw international attention to these issues, fostering global solidarity and encouraging collaborative efforts to promote equality and justice.<\/p>\n

                A Reflection of a Nation in Transition<\/h3>\n

                The trend of celebrities considering or making the decision to leave the U.S. amid Donald Trump\u2019s presidency serves as a poignant reflection of the nation\u2019s current political and social landscape. These high-profile departures underscore the deep divisions and widespread concerns about the future direction of the country. While some view these moves as necessary escapes from an oppressive environment, others see them as symbolic gestures that highlight the urgent need for political and social reform.<\/p>\n

                As Trump\u2019s administration continues to shape the country\u2019s policies and cultural norms, the decisions of these influential figures will play a crucial role in shaping public discourse and inspiring broader societal changes. Their stories serve as a powerful reminder of the profound impact that political leadership can have on individual lives and the collective conscience of a nation.<\/p>\n

                 <\/p>\n

                Whether these celebrities ultimately decide to stay or leave, their actions highlight the enduring struggle between personal values and political realities. In a time of significant transition, their choices will continue to resonate, influencing both the immediate political climate and the long-term trajectory of the United States.<\/p>\n

                How do you feel about celebrities considering leaving the U.S. due to Trump\u2019s presidency? Do you believe their actions will inspire broader change, or do they risk deepening societal divisions? Share your thoughts and perspectives below.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                Celebrities Fleeing or Considering Leaving the U.S. Amid Trump\u2019s Historic Presidency The political climate in the United States has sparked heated debates and personal decisions, particularly in light of Donald Trump\u2019s recent return to the presidency as the 47th President of the United States. Following his inauguration on January 20, 2025, Trump made history by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6329,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-6328","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-daily-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6328"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6328"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6328\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6330,"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6328\/revisions\/6330"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6329"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailynewsintime.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}